Crypto-savings lawsuit puts principles of DeFi to the test - Aliens: AI Crypto News & Markets Updates












Crypto-savings lawsuit puts principles of DeFi to the test


Thu, Jan 13, 2022


Aliens TLDR

A suit against PoolTogether, a company associated with a blockchain-based app that gamifies savings by cryptocurrency holders, challenges the DeFi community’s claims that its protocols are autonomous and self-governed The emerging world of decentralized finance offers the holders of cryptocurrency many of the amenities of a modern financial system, under the premise that blockchain technology can cut out the middlemen, replacing flesh-and-blood bankers with autonomous, self-governing computer programs.

That is the question being raised by a class-action lawsuit filed in New York federal court against one such novel DeFi service, a cryptocurrency savings application called PoolTogether.

The lawsuit, filed by a software engineer named Joseph Kent, has challenged the legality of PoolTogether’s operation, saying the scheme is essentially a lottery and prohibited under New York law.

According to legal experts, Mr. Kent’s lawsuit could be among the first to squarely address the question of who is legally accountable when a DeFi application—known as a “protocol"—is at odds with the law or causes actionable harm to a user.

Filed in late October, Mr. Kent’s suit named PoolTogether Inc., a Delaware corporation, as well as one of the protocol’s founders and a raft of its investors, as defendants.

In a filing last month, Kevin Broughel, a lawyer for PoolTogether Inc., said the company merely ran a website that provides how-to information for users to access the PoolTogether protocol.

Besides PoolTogether’s governance, Mr. Kent’s lawsuit also raises questions on how its protocol fits into existing U.S. regulatory frameworks.

Mr. Kent, who says he deposited $10 worth of cryptocurrency in PoolTogether in October, has argued the protocol doesn’t qualify as any of the institutions permitted under U.S. law to run prize-linked savings accounts.

PoolTogether “gamblers" have made deposits at least $122 million, according to Mr. Kent’s lawsuit.

The PoolTogether defendants have yet to fully respond to Mr. Kent’s claims.

But Mr. Broughel, in PoolTogether Inc.’s December filing, said his client would ask the judge to force Mr. Kent to arbitrate the matter, or alternatively dismiss the case as a matter of law.

He expressed skepticism of Mr. Kent’s motives, saying his $10 deposit was an apparent effort to create standing for his lawsuit.

Mr. Broughel also argued that the PoolTogether protocol isn’t a lottery, and that deposits made by savers don’t qualify as the purchase of lottery tickets.

Mr. Cusack, PoolTogether’s founder, also has defended the protocol against the lawsuit.

Read full article on Aliens appRead from Original Source

The best experience is on the app

Everything happening in the crypto world, in real time


Recommended Stories

Article list item background

Billionaire Mark Cuban Pours Cold Water on Terra 2.0

Mark Cuban has joined other prominent individuals in dismissing Terra 2.0



Recommended Stories


Terra governance system passes plan to burn 1.3 billion UST tokens


The UAE’s AI minister wants ‘murder’ in the metaverse to be a real crime


Terra 2.0 proposal gets the crypto community’s nod of approval but that’s not all


Everything Elon Musk Has Planned for Twitter


Shiba Inu and Dogecoin Can Now Be Traded Against Circle's Stablecoin on MEXC Global


VeChain: How this pattern could shape VET’s near-term trajectory


Ethereum could ‘take over everything’, and there won't be a multi-chain future, says EY's blockchain leader

The best experience is on the app

Download app to discover exclusive content, live market updates and more.

Get smarter and richer with the Aliens Crypto Digest

Stay informed and entertained, for free.

Follow Aliens